Part1:
Engage in a conversation for 15 minutes where you are not allowed to use any version
of a symbolic language.
I decided to try the non-verbal
experiment on my husband two year old
niece, well I was babysitting. I did not tell my husband or niece about the experiment
beforehand. I found the non-verbal
experiment to be fairly easy because both my husband and niece actually
understood what I was trying to communicate. Ironically, my niece seemed to
understand more of what I was trying to communicate than my husband. My niece caught on very
quickly and actually starting motioning for things along with me. My husband
seemed to be confused with my motions at
first and kept asking me what I was doing, but eventually he was able to
figured it out.
If this experiment were to actually
take place with two different cultures I suppose the culture that can communicate
the simplest would be able to get more ideas conveyed to more groups of people.
I also suppose the speaking culture may feel as though the culture that does
not use symbolic language is more primate or less knowledgeable. In our culture, there are individuals who
have difficulty communicating with spoken language such as the deaf. As a
culture we accept American Sign Language as a valid form of communication, which
can be taught to anyone who wants to
learn another way to communicate.
Part2:
Spend 15 minutes communicating without any physical embellishments, i.e., no
hand signals, no vocal intonation, no head, facial, or body movements.
For the second part of the
experiment I decided to have a conversation with my mother and sister. I had
not see either my mom or sister in about 3 months which meant they wanted to
catch on all of life's happenings. I did not tell my mom or sister about the
experiment beforehand. I found this
experiment to be quiet challenging and lasted maybe 10 mins. When I started speaking with mom she almost immediately noticed that I
was not communicating normally and asked if something was wrong. My sister on
the other hand, communicated that I
didn't seem very interested in the conversation and started to get irritated we
me . After the experiment I have concluded that non-speech language techniques
are very important to how we communicate because they help define our emotions
and help give meaning to spoken words.
Without non-speech language we are literally just spouting out words.
People who are visually and hearing impaired
may have difficulty reading body
language and non-speech language. An adaptive benefit of being able to read
body language is being able to evaluate a person or situation, i.e. a perceptive job applicant or a hostile situation. I do not feel that there is an environmental
condition where there might be a benefit to not reading body language because
body language is sub concise. Most of the time people do not even realize what
they are conveying to the rest of the world, which generally reveals a person's true
feelings.